It is through the use of logic and of precise, careful measurement that we become aware of our progress. Without such tools we have no reference points to indicate how far we have advanced or retreated.
The statement states that we need to use logic and precise careful measurement to become aware of our progress and without it we don't have any reference points to indicate how much we have improved or degraded. In simple language progress is how much we have improved than the last time we did that work. So in order to become fully aware or calculate the progress we require a method to measure how far progress has been made or in fact whether progress has been made or not. Therefore i strongly agree with the claim.
For example consider a chemical reaction of neutralizing an acid with a base, suppose you add 5 gram of base into an acid and it does not work that is neutralization does not occur and the next time you add 10 gram of base and the reaction succeeds. We can clearly see that we needed 5 more gram of base in order to complete the reaction, thus it can be clearly seen that if we do not use logic and precisely measure a quantity we cannot become aware of our progress. If you do not know how you performed last time how you can know whether you progressed or deteriorated from the last time. Consider another example such as a cardiovascular activity like running on a treadmill, there are four basic parameters involved to measure your performance like speed, distance, time and calories burned. Suppose you ran for 6 miles in thirty minutes one day and the next day you ran for 8 miles in the same time that means your speed, distance and the amount of calories burned increased than the last time which implies you have made progress. We can see from the example that with careful measurement we can determine that whether progress has been made or not and by how much.
However one does not always require logic and careful measurement to determine whether progress has been made or not. Consider an example of speaking a new language like German at first you are not confident and clear in speaking then you practice speaking German with your friends, teachers and within a few days you see that you are speaking fluently in German. The point is that you do not always need logic or precise careful measurement to determine if you have made progress or not. Sometimes the people you talk to, your friends and family and help you to determine whether you have progressed or not in that particular area like a feedback system.
Therefore in my opinion logic and careful measurement is must to track your progress or how much you have deteriorated and without it you cannot determine how far have you gone since the last time you did that particular work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-27 | pranav gangwani | 50 | view |
| 2018-10-27 | pranav gangwani | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 54
- It is through the use of logic and of precise, careful measurement that we become aware of our progress. Without such tools we have no reference points to indicate how far we have advanced or retreated. 50
- gggg 16
- memo 16
- jhjhj 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...aware of our progress and without it we dont have any reference points to indicate h...
^^^^
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... whether progress has been made or not. Therefore i strongly agree with the claim. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore i strongly agree with the claim. For example consider a chemical reaction...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... an acid with a base, suppose you add 5 gram of base into an acid and it does not wo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... not occur and the next time you add 10 gram of base and the reaction succeeds. We c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...e can clearly see that we needed 5 more gram of base in order to complete the reacti...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has been made or not and by how much. However one does not always require logi...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...articular area like a feedback system. Therefore in my opinion logic and carefu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ar area like a feedback system. Therefore in my opinion logic and careful measure...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...pinion logic and careful measurement is must to track your progress or how much you hav...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57974137931 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4900058483 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394396551724 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9455130059 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9333333333 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328114828948 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152392104647 0.0831039109588 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159774995433 0.0758088955206 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253401355644 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169113324512 0.0667264976115 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.