Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it, or is it better to save for some time in the future?
Money is absolutely necessary for the living, so the question to spend or to save is very controversial. My feelings are that saving gives more flexibility in life and opportunities in the future than rote spending. Therefore my preference is saving over spending.
To begin with, the need in money can appear on a sudden, so we should be ready for this. In other words, if we become ill, we can be need in money for expensive therapy or medications. The number of similar situation is countless. Some of them are losing of job, death of a relative, ask of friend to borrow money and so on. The only way to deal with these challenges is to save some money for the future. Furthermore, it is important to point out that we will not always have high stable income. To clarify, after retirement our revenues decreases significantly. To handle with it, we have to have some saved money. That will allow us to live for several decades of years. These are the reasons to save money for the future, because saving makes us more stable to the hits of destiny.
What is more, planning is always makes our life better, because provides us an opportunity to avoid obvious mistakes. By the same token, we should plan our spending beside it will certainly increase our standard of living. In our case, when we delay spending money we are able to think little more how to apply them. What I mean is that our momentary spending is not well thought out. Moreover, we frequently regret about our up-the-minute decisions. Hence, if we save money and spend them some time after, it will allow us to avoid unnecessary expenses. As a result, we will save a huge amount of money that can be spent on more useful things. This is the way, why I find the saving more beneficial over spending.
To summarize, saving has advantages over rote spending, because it provides us an opportunity to spend on more necessary things. At the same time, it ensures us protection to unpredictable cases and accidents.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-10 | Tobeornottobe | 76 | view |
2019-08-11 | Paola | 66 | view |
2019-02-08 | udayrade1206 | 70 | view |
2018-11-16 | valerii | 60 | view |
2018-02-27 | ammarak44 | 90 | view |
- If you could travel back in time to meet a famous person from history, what person would you like to meet? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 66
- If you could travel back in time to meet a famous person from history, what person would you like to meet? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 70
- The expression "Never, never give up" means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Studying foodways – what foods people eat and how they produce ,acquire,prepare,and consume them-is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture. 50
- The number of people who are overweight is rising in Western society. Why is this the case? What can be done about it? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
Money is absolutely necessary for the living, so the question to spen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ities in the future than rote spending. Therefore my preference is saving over spending. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, i mean, as a result, in other words, to begin with, what is more, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66951566952 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66658752652 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51566951567 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.638775976 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.2608695652 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2608695652 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221120461859 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659360089947 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562168070383 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126122720006 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514491421369 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.