The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997
to 2010.
The given chart illustrate the amount of renewable energy in relation to total energy in four different countries since 1997 till 2010. In overall view, it can be seen that Iceland has the much amount of renewable energy in three survived years. Also, the consumption of new energy has increased from about 45 in 1997 to 70 in 2010.
On the other hand, Turkey which has the second much proportion of renewable energy, showed a fluctuation. The usage of new energy was roughly 38 in 1997 but it has risen to a bit more than 40 in 2000. While it decreased to about 32 in 2010.
Sweden experienced a similar pattern with Iceland where the amount of renewable energy has an upward trend and it has gradually increased from 5 in 1997 to just less than 10 in 2010.
The noticeable point is about the usage in Australia which showed a downward trend. In other words, proportion of this kind energy has the maximum amount in 1997 by about 10, but it has declined to about 5 in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-17 | yaldaasgari | 91 | view |
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? 11
- Nowadays more and more people want to get things done instantly Why is it Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph shows the number of fatal injuries resulting in death of workers in New Zealand between 1992 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 74
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea.What are the reasons and solutions? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as risen to a bit more than 40 in 2000. While it decreased to about 32 in 2010. Swe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49720670391 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42413043209 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519553072626 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6474877427 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389561282755 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154986533202 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990431033962 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226532530532 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986808929992 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.