Nowadays, in some colleges or universities, professors prohibit students from using electronic devices ( such as computers, laptops and smart-phones ） that can help them to connect to the internet while the class is going on. Do you think it is a good idea and why? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Today, in many universities, professors ban students from using internet-connected electronic devices in their class. I believe that this is a very indispensable classroom regulation. There are some reasons and examples to illustrate my point of view.
The use of internet-connected devices reduces learning. Many college students now rely on the Internet for socializing and entertainment, and sometimes even indulge in it. At the same time, university professors spend most of their time in the classroom on academic matters, such as giving lectures or answering questions, rather than disciplining students like many middle school teachers do. As a result, many college students use their computers or mobile phones to surf social networks, shopping, and even play games in class instead of looking for information or taking notes. In college, for example, we all took computers and cell phones to some general education classes. Everyone used to watch video or play games together in class, usually just for a while, but then a two-hour class went by. Every time there was a quiz, several of us had to cram our notes together for review, and sometimes we could not even get a complete set of notes and struggled to pass each exam.
The use of networked devices can affect the professor's judgment of students' learning situation. It is widely accepted that the content taught by professors in class is not fixed and it will be adjusted according to students' understanding and mastery. If the students understand quickly and the application is correct, the professor will quickly move on to the next part of the lecture, but if the students cannot answer the professor's questions accurately, the professor needs to reexplain or give a few more examples, or even change the teaching method. This requires students to provide real feedback. However, internet-connected electronic devices can help students find any information they need in class, and even computers can intelligently answer professors' questions. Students seem to have mastered what they have learned, but actually they do not, which is such a common situation in arts and social courses such as history and literature. Students often perform greatly differently in their papers and exams precisely because they answer questions, hold discussions and write thesis with the help of network. However, without the help of the powerful database of the Internet, they are forced to give up their secrets in the exams.
Admittedly, it is necessary for students to use electronic devices in class. On the one hand, using electronic devices to take notes is faster than writing by hand, and it is also convenient to mark key points, while reviewing is very clear and planned. But all we need is an electronic device, not a network at all. On the other hand, we can't deny that many times students do need to look up the authoritative source in class, or retrieve a terminology mentioned by the professor themselves, to reduce the problem of interrupting the class. However, if the school can build a strong enough on-campus database and a convenient local area network, this problem can be solved well.
In summary, networked electronic devices should be prohibited in class in universities and colleges.
- Government has done enough to educate people the importance of a balanced lifestyle and healthy eating habits 3
- TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one? 81
- It is easier to be well-educated today than it is in the past. 90
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
- The best way to increase students’ interest in a subject is to explain to them how this subject can help them in their lives outside the school. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...use of networked devices can affect the professors judgment of students learning situation...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 340, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...a network at all. On the other hand, we cant deny that many times students do need t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, so, then, well, while, for example, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2766.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33976833977 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36532946019 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523166023166 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9762499314 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329323353644 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100331464154 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080121572615 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191782385937 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396963004325 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.