The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart compares the average household expenses in Japan and Malaysia in terms of 5 different categories in 2010.
Overall, housing and transport accounted for the largest proportion of expenditure in both countries. Spending on food was relatively similar in 2 countries while expenses for healthcare as well as other goods and services in Malaysia was lower than Japan.
People in Japan spend about 29% of their budget on transport, this number was a little bit higher than 26% in Malaysia. By contrast, housing in Malaysia accounted for 34% compared to just 21% in Japan.
The percentage of expenses on food in Japan was 24% which was quite close to 27% in Malaysia. However, the expenditure on health care accompanied with other goods and services of Malaysian was only half of the same-kind expenditure of Japanese with 3% and 10% compared to 6% and 20%, respectively.
- Cinema attendance by age group 67
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 73
- The table and pie charts show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 73
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... budget on transport, this number was a little bit higher than 26% in Malaysia. By contras...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0612244898 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83662865428 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598639455782 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7840699467 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162514002762 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880871952483 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830150430491 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127315928396 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940577069386 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.