The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries in 2009 and 2010
The pie charts give information about how foreign students registered the online English courses in Australia, USA and Canada in 2009 and 2010.
Overall, the proportion of international students used Internet to book the course all increased over years in three countries. The 3 remained categories varied upward and forward differently by years and by countries.
In 2009, the percentages of registration by Internet in Australia, USA and Canada were 24%, 25% and 27%, respectively. These number then considerably rose up by 3% to 28% in USA and 30% in Canada while Australia witnessed a significant growth to 39% in 2010. Students who pre-booked with agents accounted for both 26% in Australia and Canada and 23% in USA in 2009. In spite of the development of this method in USA and Canada to 26% and 35% in 2010, the same kind of figure sharply dropped to 17% in Australia.
The percentages of international students booked the course on arrival in Australia and Canada were similar of 30%, this figure in USA was 24% in 2009. Whereas this ratio of USA stood stable, the figure of Canada decreased by half to 15% and Australia increased by 5% to 35% in 2010. Others method accounted for 20%, 28% and 7% in Australia, USA and Canada respectively then fell to 13% and 22% in Australia and America, and went up in Canada to 20% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | minhthanh211 | 74 | view |
| 2018-11-26 | Minh Pham | 46 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008 87
- Marriages in America 73
- The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries in 2009 and 2010 46
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, kind of, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78540772532 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84236844423 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49356223176 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6371376282 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245589931841 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111993921512 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875390234962 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178628990128 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593700675245 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.