Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Unpaid community services are proposed by some folks to be the compulsory programmes such as charity, teaching society, coaching sports for the younger children. This notion bring some views which support and against with and these upcoming paragraphs I will deliver some considerations between both of sides.
Those people who disagree with, bring some reasons which are reasonable enough. Firstly, the unpaid community service programmes automatically impact time-consuming for learning hard skills. Moreover, a dramatic shifting on economic and technological environment increase life-challenging for the future generation and there is no place for unskilled labour. Second reason is, a high-cognitive skilled student is more beneficial for the society. Currently, social living is controlled by the cutting-edge world system where people can do anything just with the small tools in their hand. Lifestyle has been forced to adapt with newly world face. Unfortunately, these changes cannot be conducted without high-cognitive skilled human.
Regarding those people support this issue, arguing it with a few deeply understanding. First of all, these programmes will be cultivating a high-care-sensitivity student character. The people are characterized like this is more and more important to improve the hard-troubled society life. The technological advancement which has broken our society just can be overcome with the high-charismatic role model. Showing the modern lifestyle is not 100% proper for human life. The next argument is, the student will be earlier to catch the social problem and feel the real-life exposure. Therefore, these future generations can making out surroundings well and learning provide the solution for their community. These small movements actually has potency to move the whole society for taking care their neighborhood, their young children, the poor persons. So, it improves the human life harmony
To summarise above two-side views, I stand as supporter of second views which looking forward of the unpaid community service programmes as a positive thing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Sohaib270 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Mihir Rami | 78 | view |
- Birth rate 78
- German farmers sue government over missed climate targets 84
- The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive 56
- Birth rate 56
- the internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of thistechnology has been positive. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'brings'.
Suggestion: brings
...s for the younger children. This notion bring some views which support and against wi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to provide'
Suggestion: to provide
...king out surroundings well and learning provide the solution for their community. These...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 891, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... So, it improves the human life harmony To summarise above two-side views, I sta...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7652733119 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15299504873 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614147909968 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3574657453 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6111111111 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287859851463 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857601053512 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902485442964 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178844943698 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730467204152 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.