The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.
The line chart illustrates the changing patterns in comparison of car theft in Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada over the course of 10 years starting in 1990.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the number of car thefts in Sweden and France experienced an upward trend between 1990 and 1999, meanwhile the figures in other countries about remained consistent. Throughout the period, the highest proportion of car thefts was registered by the UK, about 18 robberies among 1000 vehicles.
In 1990, the rate of car thefts in Canada stood at 7 per 1000 automobiles, which wasn’t altered at the end of the period although it fall into 5/1000 in the year of 1993. A similar pattern was witnessed in Great Britain, whereas two remainder lines gradually went up.
At the beginning of the course, car-theft rate of Sweden was nearly 2/1000 higher than the one of Canada. A relatively dramatically increase of its was seen, became almost double in 1999, while France’s rate experienced a slight rise from the lowest at first to the same with Canada.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | Max Colorado | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Shivani Miglani | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | Tash | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | lamdangamser | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'falls'?
Suggestion: falls
...ed at the end of the period although it fall into 5/1000 in the year of 1993. A simi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...west at first to the same with Canada.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96703296703 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70590868184 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2256112193 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170532321526 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787235229169 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597948291073 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106247919186 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469078900601 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.