It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
When weighing up the local history and world history, several people appreciate the former. In my opinion, these two fields of historical knowledge are both important in their own ways.
To begin, it is understandable why the importance of studying local history at school is undeniable. Firstly, i strongly agree with the idea that having thorough insights into what occurred in the past in one’s own country will develop people’s patriotism and pride. Pupils in Vietnam, for instance, often feel a sense of pride when learning about several victories of Vietnamese ancients against outside intruders in a number of long-lasting wars. As a result, youngsters gradually love them homeland more. Moreover, learning local history increases children's confidence and sense of achievement, encouraging them to protect their traditional values. Without doing it, the culture of the country may become fainter and fainter.
From another angle, there are various reasons why learning world history is beneficial for youngsters. It is worth considering that the world history complements the local history in helping a student understand the world. Undoubtedly, the present world is a product of the past, and future generations should avoid the mistakes of the past generations to create a sustainable ecosystem. For instance, understanding the reasons behind world wars and genocides helps students appreciate the need for an inclusive and consensus based approach to solving problems.Moreover, having thorough insights into global historical events help children understand the problem in the locality now. In particular, the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 had similar causes with the Great Depression of the 1930s. By understanding that events, children are able to prevent their country from financial disaster in the future.
To sum up, i disagree with the greater importance placed on local history as compared with global historical events.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Darshnatrivedi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | nagakhoa | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | IWTA80 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
When weighing up the local history and w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are both important in their own ways. To begin, it is understandable why the i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry may become fainter and fainter. From another angle, there are various re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...nsus based approach to solving problems.Moreover, having thorough insights into global h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from financial disaster in the future. To sum up, i disagree with the greater i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ter in the future. To sum up, i disagree with the greater importance pl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, moreover, so, for instance, in particular, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60810810811 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99552259014 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9462440403 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285534520578 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858936598906 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616557620201 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159853009721 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217489512309 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.