Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Generally speaking, advancement of the technology brings many pros and cons to all the nations all around the world. People think everything even people characteristics' are about to change. The happiness and joyousness of people are not exception from that. Some may think nowadays people are less happy than they were before. Others may disagree. In my opinion people are still happy and get satisfied like they were did at past decades.
First and foremost, people are still excited and happy with their lives as before because they are still following and perusing same old needs that they were following long time ago. They are still searching for foods to satisfy their selves and fulfill their needs but in totally new ways. For instance, in past they had to go into the woods with their families to search for foods or even hunt wild animals to eat them. But nowadays they are shopping online for their foods and needs. The families in the past decades and centuries were living in more crowded families and homes, sometimes maybe two or three families were living happily together and spent quality times together, but nowadays because of their busy lives and growth of cities they are living apart from each other and it may seem at first that they are more isolated and sadder but in reality, they are communicating with each other from distances. With the advancement of technology, they can easily video call with each other from very far distances and spend happy and quality times together. As you can see people are still happy but in new era of living, their form of happiness is also new.
Second, as the world is changing so quickly and everything become much easier for people they have more time to spend with their family and friends. As a result, they have more time to visit their loved ones, they have more time to satisfy themselves. For instance, entertainment and outdoor and indoor activities are at higher rate in comparison to past. For example, some parents are working from home with help of their laptops and computers. As a result, they have more chance to spend time with their kids.
All in all, though some may disagree my opinion, the ways that leading to happiness is changed a lot in compare to the past. This is why people are still happy and satisfied about their living style as they were at the past decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | mashghanbar | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bonjourkmm | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Should children be allowed to watch tv advertisements? 73
- is it good learn foreign language 2 83
- Is learning a foreign language good or bad 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... happy and get satisfied like they were did at past decades. First and foremost, p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, so, still, apart from, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7512195122 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27954199769 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460975609756 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.1501715532 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354841405805 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120175819004 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829063064227 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239199664524 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626109512751 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.