Many people work from home using modern technology today. Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not employers. Do you agree or disagree?
Currently, the modern technology is indeed a blessing to the mankind. Telecommuting is one of those which have become very popular and exercised by millions of people when internet connections are very fast and reliable. This innovation is helpful to both employees and employers. However, employees get higher advantages from it.
To begin with, working from home brings several benefits to the employees. To enumerate, employees need not to travel for work which saves money and time. Consequently, it helps workers to pay more attention to work and family by reducing excessive stress of commuting between office and home. To illustrate, money saved in travel is used to fulfill the demands of family and time is devoted to children and other family members. Moreover, it gives freedom of no fixed time when working from home, thus work schedule is adjusted to the comfort of an employee. Although most of the work done by tele-workers is monitored, still a few minutes can be snatched at times. Finally, the tele-worker can do some side business side by side. In other words, involving in different works gives an opportunity of increased income and more money.
On other hand, the trend not only benefited employees but employers are benefited in many ways as well. Firstly, it saves cost spent on expensive office. To explain, office needs big space and infrastructure to provide all facilities at work and include exorbitant expenses which is avoided by telecommuting. Secondly, employers can hire people across the world as opportunity free them from all geographical ties, it provides more talented labor at cheaper rates, so add to savings too. In India, for example, many multinational companies hire run business successfully with no actual office and have big turnovers. Furthermore, it has been seen that employees take less sick leave and other leaves. This is also beneficial for employers. On paradoxical side, monitoring and supervising employees is difficult so it affects the work productivity. To illustrate, training to employees is mandatory and cannot be provided at home.
In the light of all facts one can conclude that, working from home using modern technology is good option but it offers more conveniences and benefits to employees rather than the employers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-23 | hoangteo0103 | 49 | view |
- Figures show that some countries have an ever increasing proportion of the population who are aged 15 or younger What do you think are the current and future effects of this trend for those countries 67
- Some people believe that teenagers should always follow the examples of older people and some believe it is natural in teenagers to challenge what old people say Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Many people complain about stress at work How can employers reduce stress at work and what can employers do on their own to solve this problem 76
- Animals should not be used for the benefit of human beings unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Many people think that home cooked food is healthy but many people still prefer eating out Why is this so 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'travel'?
Suggestion: travel
...oyees. To enumerate, employees need not to travel for work which saves money and time. Co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, for example, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23306233062 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90030893575 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579945799458 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8622297661 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7727272727 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7727272727 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68181818182 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283703213751 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733060791828 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583050130478 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174291049989 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372260554655 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.