fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, many hold the view that it is a positive development for some countries to apply alternative energy sources to replace traditional ones. However, there is a body of opinion which claims that the use of such new energy. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the newly-exploited energy can reduce the environmental pollution, since such alternative energy sources as solar or wind power are clean and produce no emissions when they are used to operate machines, like cars. Apart from that, the alternative power can avoid energy crisis for they are renewable. For example, when the solar energy is used to replace petrol to run cars, it will not be depleted due to the fact that it is infinite and also this traditional fuel will be preserved.
On the other hand, however, it is expensive to employ the alternative source. The reason is that the machines powered by wind or sun are specially made, which means that the raw material for these devices is rare and costs factories a fortune to collect. Furthermore, the new energy may be low efficient. To be specific, as modern technology is not advanced enough to exploit the pristine solar power completely and efficiently apply it in industrial activities.
To summarize, there is no doubt that employing the fresh energy is a good way to protect the environment and provide human beings with endless resources. At the same time, however, the energy is costly with low efficiency. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that the sustainable energy source has more positives than negatives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-12 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Schools should concentrate on teaching students the academic subjects that will be useful for their future career Subjects such as music and sports are not useful To what extent do you agree of disagree 87
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- New parents should attend parenting class to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, many hold the view that it is ...
^^
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that it is a positive developm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of the debate to seek a conclusion. To begin with, it is undeniable that the...
^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to operating'.
Suggestion: used to operating
... and produce no emissions when they are used to operate machines, like cars. Apart from that, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s traditional fuel will be preserved. On the other hand, however, it is expens...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly apply it in industrial activities. To summarize, there is no doubt that emp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, apart from, for example, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94584837545 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79703959843 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.244605264 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256956265759 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875844969296 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906452512676 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157719705795 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725169150714 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.