The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
The given maps illustrate information about a number of chances taking place in the village of Stokeford in the year 1930 to 2010.
In general, it can be seen that the town was been completely urbanized after the constructions of several facilities. The most significant changes took place in the farmland which then was replaced by houses.
To begin with, in 1930, the most Stokeford land was used for agriculture, one was on the top right-hand corner of the village, the other was in the middle between the River Stoke and the main road Besides, the post office and the two shops were built next to the semi-detached houses in the left hand-side of the main road. In the opposite side, there was a primary school being in close proximity to houses and a large house was located on the east of the garden.
As can be seen in the second picture, all farmland was demolished to be converted into residential areas. In addition, more houses which were established along the two sides of the main road and the post office still remained the same locate. Besides, the gardens waere decreased in size to make way for retirement home and the two more houses were built behind the primary school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...n general, it can be seen that the town was been completely urbanized after the construc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...de, there was a primary school being in close proximity to houses and a large house was located...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, still, then, in addition, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69047619048 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52192652127 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3994471834 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.125 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0974944510147 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509286294605 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114646486076 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984851673593 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146407328143 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.