The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart above demonstrates the proportion of status of Australian secondary graduates in 3 years with intervals of 10 years from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, we can easily see that while in 1980, the great majority of Australian school leavers went to further education, the highest proportion of secondary graduates in both 1980 and 2000 was employed. In contrast, unemployment remained the least uncommon status of Australian students after leaving secondary school in the given period.
In terms of unemployment, there was a fluctuation between 1998 and 2000. The figure started at 10% and dropped slightly at the end of the period after increasing to 12% in the year 1990.
While the proportion of Australian secondary graduates going to further education decreased gradually from 50% to about 37%, the figure for employed students after graduating from secondary school going up dramatically, which went up for 15% through the shown period.
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people say that in all level of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. 61
- Children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to school What are the reasons How can we solve this problem 92
- Some people say that all young people should be required to stay in full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think it is of little use to study history; others think learning history helps us prepare for our modern life. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart above demonstrates the proportion of st...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34437086093 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8799800934 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576158940397 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1655672728 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178954646986 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887354782785 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662710919077 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10353569953 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673487822025 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.