Household spending patterns of British and Australian households.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The given bar charts compare the household expenses of five categories in the UK and New Zealand in the span of twenty years.
As we can see in the charts, British household spent the most money in entertainment throughout the twenty years. It is also noticeable that in 2008, New Zealand families no longer spent the most in food and drinks but in utility bills.
When comparing the spending patterns of UK families in 1980 and 2008, it is noticed that leisure constitutes the highest percentage of spending, which increased moderately by 7%. The following category is utility bills that only rose slightly from 26 to 28%. While the expenditure on transport dipped by 1%, the amount of money spent in food and drinks dropped significantly by 10%.
As for families in Australia, the charts illustrate food and drinks is replaced by utility bills as the highest spending category in 2008. In contrast with utility bills that rose from 27% to 31%, Australians spent less in food and drinks by 4%. Australian families spent a comparable amount of money in transport and leisure. The amount of money spent increased and decreased by 1% in the category of transport and entertainment respectively. </span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | dorae | 67 | view |
- Household spending patterns of British and Australian households. 73
- cement manufacture 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...e highest spending category in 2008. In contrast with utility bills that rose from 27% t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18669680459 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9619120857 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124620187895 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484666704235 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463687642357 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699920408002 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161390200153 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.