Do you agree or disagree with the statement? When leading a group, most people talk while others listen. But best leaders always spend more listening others' ideas.
A good leader ship plays an important role in a successful company. However, what is the distinctive characteristic for a leader to have? There is controversy on rather leaders should speak more and others listen or the leaders should listen more to others. In my opinion, leaders should definitely listen more to others.
First of all, leaders can learn by listening to others. To be more specific, every single person has their own opinion, and there is not a correct answer. Therefore, when leaders listen to others, they can learn a same thing in a different point of view. Take me as an example, there is one time that I have a school project need to be done with my group, and since I am the leader, I make all of the decision by myself. However, after I made the decision, one of my group member told me that there is some mistakes in those decisions. Therefore, we started another group discussion. This time, I listen to the other members in my group and I find out that there are some points that I had never thought about before. As a result, by listening to the group members can help leaders understand something in a different angle.
In addition, leaders can have a better understand about their group members when they listen to them. When people are describing their thought, leaders will be able to carefully listen to them and know what they are actually think. For example, my dad is a manager in the company, and he always need to handle some meetings. During the meeting, he will listen to everyone’s idea. By doing this, he can manage the company better because he knows that what every single person thinks. On the other hand, if leaders do not listen to others, how can they figure out what is his group members thinking? Moreover, it will cause more conflict during the discussion. To sum up, in order for leaders to have a better understand of their group members, leaders need to listen to their ideas.
Undoubtedly, some people may say that it is better for leaders to speak more because leaders always have a better opinion. However, I think that leaders are not always correct. Therefore, they should listen to other people’s idea in order to make a better decision and lead to a better result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-03 | Steven Huang | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...roup, and since I am the leader, I make all of the decision by myself. However, after I ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some mistakes'?
Suggestion: there are some mistakes
...on, one of my group member told me that there is some mistakes in those decisions. Therefore, we start...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...to them and know what they are actually think. For example, my dad is a manager in th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65404040404 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53429064404 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439393939394 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7993690555 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1304347826 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2173913043 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17391304348 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307370723473 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102401930248 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065047999757 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213178777739 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145463156428 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.