TOEFL TPO 01 - Integrated Writing Task
In the reading section, the author contends that the option of a four-day workweek would benefit companies, the country as a whole, and individuals who decided to take this option. However, in the listening part, the professor rejects the passage's idea by presenting three strong reasons.
First of all, the writer makes the point that four-day workweek would increase companies profits because they would have more efficient employees which make fewer costly mistakes. In contrast, the lecturer rejects this idea by stating that shortened workweek will force companies to spend more money. Adding new workers mean putting more money into training and medical benefits. In addition, new employees need office positions and new computers which can decrease company profits.
Secondly, contrary to the idea in the reading suggesting that working for four-day a week would decrease the unemployment rate which is a crucial advantage for any economy. The professor argues that companies have other options they might choose to ask their employees to work over time. Worse, they might start to expect four-day employees can do same amount of job they used to do in five days. If this happens, no additional job will be available and current jobs will become unpleasant.
Lastly, even though the writer indicates that working for four day per week is better for people because they have more free time to enjoy and spend with their relatives, the professor mentions that this option presents some risks and also it would reduce the quality of life. job stability would be in danger and four-day employees are more likely to lose their jobs during a economy depression. Besides, companies prefer to have five-day employees in management positions to insure of consistent supervision and continues coverage.
- TOEFL TPO 01 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TOEFL T P O 01 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO 1, Integrated Writing 3
- TOEFL TPO 01 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to be among the most important in the history of world cinema. To this day, in fact, it remains the American box office c 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eading section, the author contends that the option of a four-day workweek would...
^^
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the author contends that the option of a four-day workweek would benefit compan...
^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passages'' or 'passage's'?
Suggestion: passages'; passage's
...stening part, the professor rejects the passages idea by presenting three strong reasons...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... idea by stating that shortened workweek will force companies to spend more money...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Job
...so it would reduce the quality of life. job stability would be in danger and four-d...
^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e more likely to lose their jobs during a economy depression. Besides, companies ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28819444444 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51279278974 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0092229739 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.554318759429 0.272083759551 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178024206589 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113403625055 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329635025952 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880684579236 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.