TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one?
Both the reading passage and the lecture are discussing the issue that whether the silver coin discovered in a native American archaeological site is fake. The author of the reading passage contends that it is fake due to three reasons, while the statement of the professor contradicts with it by convincingly pointing out the weaknesses existing in the passage.
First, the author of the article contends that due to the long distance between the site and Norse settlements in Canada, it was impossible for the Norse to arrive at the site. However, the professor rebuts that the Norse traveled great distance to bring objects, hence, they probably used the silver coins to buy some objects back to their settlement place.
What's more, despite of the assertion in the reading passage that no other coins can be found in the site, the professor suggests that since the Norse did not settle there permanently, they were likely to pack up all their silver coins and take them back to Europe, which resulted in the situation that no other coins can be found.
Finally, the author asserts in the article that as experienced explorers, the Norse were capable of predicting that coins were useless in America since native North Americans did not recognize coins as money, whereas the professor harbors the idea that the Norse probably took silver coins for its appeal in beauty, like jewelry. Meanwhile, provided that once they convinced the native Americans to realize the value of coins, they could trade with local residents with coins.
In a nutshell, the professor strongly points out the weaknesses existing in the article and verifies that the silver coins discovered in the archaeology site are genuine evidence for exploring the history of the presence of the Norse.
- High salaries with high risks of losing a job or a secure job with a low salary 90
- Schools always collect information about teachers' teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who perform well. Which way do you think is more useful?1. to evaluate teachers' performance by students2. to evaluate teachers' performance by teac 73
- The more money people have, the more money they should give away to charity 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is difficult for teachers to be both popular ( well-liked ) and effective to help students learning. 73
- Ambitious dreams or realistic dreams 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...bjects back to their settlement place. Whats more, despite of the assertion in the r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03741496599 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52403184015 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506802721088 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4925862776 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.125 110.228320801 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.75 21.698381199 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467367173384 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200504158602 0.0996497079465 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965612216487 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254095887056 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062981593532 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.3589403974 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.