Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits.
First of all, the taxes discourage people from indulging in unhealthy behaviors. Raising taxes on cigarettes, for instance, leads people to buy fewer of them. Smoking has declined as taxes on tobacco have risen, showing that these taxes do work to make society healthier. It can be expected that imposing similar taxes on unhealthy food and beverages would help reduce obesity rates.
Second, taxes of this kind are financially fair. When people get sick as a result of their smoking or eating unhealthy foods, they create medical costs. It is unfair that everyone in the society, including nonsmokers and people who follow a healthy diet, should contribute equally to covering these costs. Taxing people who engage in unhealthy behaviors creates extra income that can be used to cover the medical costs. In this way, some of the financial burden is shifted from all of society to just those who choose to participate in the unhealthy activities.
Finally, the high rate of taxation on cigarettes significantly increases revenue for the government. In addition to using this tax revenue on medical assistance, governments often use the revenue for other projects that benefit public welfare, such as building stadiums or creating public parks. Even basic government-supported services like public education benefit from these taxes. Thus, the taxes on cigarettes, and the proposed taxes on unhealthy foods, benefit everyone.
The reading and lecture are both about the advantages and disadvantages of taxation on cigarettes and unhealthy foods. The author of the reading passage states that increasing tax on cigarettes and unhealthy foods is advantageous because it discourages people from using cigarettes or unhealthy foods, it is financially fair, and it increases the government's revenue; however, the lecturer repudiates these ideas. Indeed, she casts doubts on the three main points made in the reading passage by providing three alternative convincing reasons.
To begin with, even though the author mentions that increasing taxes discourages people from using unhealthy foods as well as cigarettes, the lecturer refutes this opinion. She discusses that by increasing taxes on cigarettes or unhealthy foods, people will be inclined to use cheaper cigarettes or foods. As a consequence, it exacerbates the people's health condition. In fact, the decision puts the people's health on the brink of jeopardy.
Secondly, although the reading passage says that the taxes are fair, the lecturer holds that these taxations do not consider the people's incomes. For instance, many affluent people should pay taxes as equal as indigent individuals. Furthermore, the same process can be applied to unhealthy foods, too. Thus, this idea is problematic.
Last but not least, on the one hand, in the reading passage, the author mentions that the high rate of taxation on cigarettes or unhealthy foods can be deemed as a profitable revenue for the government. On the other hand, the lecturer claims that the government cannot ignore the zillion dollars of cigarettes' or unhealthy foods' incomes or revenues. In other words, the government will support these industries because, in the status quo situation, they can be implied as a profitable revenue source for itself.
To wrap things up, the reading and lecture are both about the pros and cons of taxation on cigarettes and unhealthy foods. Whereas the author buttresses his or her opinions, the three main points in the reading are challenged effectively by the lecturer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-10 | toefl 2019 | 76 | view |
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 80
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To achieve successful development of a country, a government should spend more money on young children's education rather than on universities' 80
- Many people are afraid of leaving their houses because of the spread of crimes. Some think that more actions can be taken to prevent crime from occurring, but others think little can be done. What is your opinion? 76
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... financially fair, and it increases the governments revenue; however, the lecturer repudiat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
.... As a consequence, it exacerbates the peoples health condition. In fact, the decision...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ndition. In fact, the decision puts the peoples health on the brink of jeopardy. Seco...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in fact, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34848484848 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84103636079 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478787878788 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8006154882 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3125 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303891752664 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10122507478 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847808875193 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17096890469 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046351576475 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.