The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
"Technology, is of course, a double-edged sword. Fire can cook our food but also burn us." -- Jason Silva. As human technological capabilities advance, once seemingly "sci-fi" technolgies such as Artifical Intelligence and Machine Learning are playing an increasing role in everyday human lives. However, some critics argue that machines will never truly replace humans, because they are nothing more than tools of human minds. Seeing as even the smarted biologists themselves fail to truly comprehend the complete emchanics of the human mind, it is questionable whether it can ever truly be replicated in machine form. However, who is to say that the human mind is the acme of all forms of intelligence. It has already been proven that machines are capable of doing somes task much better than humans could ever do. While machines will most probably never be capable of perfectly emulating human minds, they will definetly come to do many, if not all, human tasks, better than human beings themselves.
While scientific breakthroughs such as genome sequencing have revolutionized our understanding of human minds, we are still a long way from understanding them in their entirety. Popular technologies such as "Artifical Intelligence" and "Machine Learning," can seemingly sound as if they are supplanting or perfectly mimicing true human intelligence, or in reality very rudimentary impressions of how human minds work. AI is nothing more than a set of "yes or no" options--dependent on easily measurable internal or external factors- programmed into a machine. Machine learning makes use of reinforcement learning that is a very primitive implementation of how humans understand and approach new concepts or challenges. Until humans figure out how every single part of the human brain works--its functions, mechanics, applications--they will never be able to compeltely replicate it. And even if this information was attainable one day, it is still doubtful whether we will every have the technology to transfer the intelleigence of carbon-based lifeforms into silicon chips.
However,the entire premise that human minds will always remain far superios to machines, is based on the premise that the human mind is the zenith of all known forms of intelligence. But how ddoes one quantify intelligence? Octopi are known for their highly intelligent decentralized brains--independent and functional in its seperate tentacles. Dolphins use sonar and electromagnetism to navigate the oceans. There are many types of different intelligent lifeforms already present, who think in and work in vastly different ways than humans do--sometimes in ever more superios ways. Machines have already proven to outperform humans in tasks where repition and tedious calculations are involved. It is entirely possible that machines become superior to humans, even if they are not derivatives or emulators of human minds.
Computers have already beaten humans at "highly intellectual" games for the human mind such as chess. Computer programming has only been around for a couple of decades and it has already surpassed created programs that surpasse the capabilities of some of the smartest human beings. A famous example being the world renowned chess player being defeated by a chess program. Machines are wired differently from humans, and can hence, perform tasks which they were made for, better than humans can. Calculators and inscribers were once the jobs of humans. However, technology has been able to more quickly and efficiently do their jobs. However, machines have been unable to ever outform some human tasks such as writing stories and making art. Human minds and machine intelligence can both be equally superior in different ways.
The onset of revolutionary technologies such as AI and machine learning in recent years has opened upon a discussion about their potential roles in the future. Perhaps, rendering the need for human intelligence obsolete oneday. However, intelligence is difficult to quantify and near impossible to compare. Machines are already better at doing many menial human tasks, and in the future they will continue to pick up and more efficiently complete low level human tasks that are unwanted by humans--opening the door for new fields and opportunities for the people. Machines will not out perform or become superior to human minds, but work in tandem with them to propel us forward to a better future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-22 | Anoyn_1110 | 50 | view |
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your posit 81
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 58
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.Write a response in which you 81
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from thosewhose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ligence' and 'Machine Learning,' can seemingly sound as if they are sup...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...lifeforms into silicon chips. However,the entire premise that human minds will al...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, while, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3809.0 2235.4752809 170% => OK
No of words: 694.0 442.535393258 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48847262248 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13262893113 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23125425939 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 346.0 215.323595506 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49855907781 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 1209.6 704.065955056 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6903202065 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.029411765 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.97058823529 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275378295054 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077464090392 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618143006943 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182369326692 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367688945415 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 188.0 100.480337079 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.