Inuktitut
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading passage in whether there are threats to the continued existence of Inuktitut. First of all, the reading says that a study shows that only 25% of the young Inuk people speak Inuktitut. However, the listening argues that this study were talking about the old version of Inuktitut that were lost. These 25% do not means that there are only 25% of people still speak Inuktitut, it means that 25% of the young do not speak the old version of Inuktitut as their ancestor did. Besides, other studies had shown that more and more people start speaking the new version of Inuktitut. As a result, this explanation in not accurate.
In addition, the reading implies that Inuk people have focused more on learning English education. On the other hand, the listening asserts that English education did not cause any impact on Inuktitut. Inuktitut were important because the people who work at the fishing industry can only speak the native tone. Therefore, Inuk learned both English and Inuktitut. In this way, they will be able to communicate with those people who work at the fishing industry. In other words, Inuk parents will encourage their kids to study both English and Inuktitut.
Last but not least, the reading indicates that media cause a significant impact because most of the local radio and programs use English and French instead of Inuktitut. However, the listening argues that it is true that media will cause some impact, but we need to look at the right media. People often use internet instead of radio or programs. There are a lot of Inuktitut website for people to communicated, and people had found out that Inuk still prefer to use Inuktitut. In other words, radios and programs are not likely to cause significant treat to the Inuktitut.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-16 | Steven Huang | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
...ktitut that were lost. These 25% do not means that there are only 25% of people still...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, in addition, talking about, as a result, first of all, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41657993896 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460784313725 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1406616088 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4117647059 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4052369583 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160007649952 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111389733955 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297403438625 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370365753055 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.