The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates an overview of the contamination levels in London from 1600 to 2000.
It is clear that the level of sulphur dioxide emissions was considerably higher than that of smoke released throughout the surveyed period. However, it is noticeable that both types of exhaust fumes given were nearly eliminated in the last year of the 400-year period.
Since 1600, London had seen a dramatic increase in the amounts of sulphur dioxide and smoke emissions. The level of sulphur dioxide released rose massively to roughly 750 micrograms per cubic metre in the period between 1700 and 1750. This figure was well over threefold as high as that of smoke emitted, which was close to 250 micrograms per cubic metre.
Despite a declining number from 1750 to 1800, the pollution levels due to these two types of toxic fumes still increased until the year 1900, peaking at almost 1000 and 500 micrograms per cubic metre with respect to sulphur dioxide and smoke respectively. Since then, the level of emissions from both had recorded a fluctuation, until reaching 0 micrograms per cubic metre in 2000.
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.ielts process diagram 11
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, still, then, well, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03783783784 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57087127426 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572972972973 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7264312247 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101191603065 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539919056231 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485614516896 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777296380321 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052450751479 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.