Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their family. Discuss
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Recently,
the phenomenon of a long time working and its corresponding impacts have sparked
a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of affordable work
is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive
and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe
that optimum work hours can be plus and I will analyze that throughout this
essay.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">From a
social standpoint, hard working can provide the society with some noticeable
effect which rooted in the fact that the merits of full-time jobs, as well as high-paid
job, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a
university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered analytical
results of spending too many hours at work. Thus, beneficial ramifications of
both part-time jobs and family time apparently can be seen.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Within the
realm of science, working rush hours might increase the consequence of exhausting,
low energy and inappropriate mood. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional
work timetable would relate to this reality that the demerits of unaffordable
cooperation pertain to boring long-hour working. As an example, some scientific
research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside
of non-stop working is correlated negatively with the weakness of job efficacy. Hence,
it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of short-time of family leisure</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">To conclude,
while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that
the benefits of the optimization of working hours and spending enough time with
family far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a vibrant and happy
workplace prove the significance of family relationships. But also pinpoint
the long-term implications.</span></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 85
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credits. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2359.0 1207.87684729 195% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 8.13448275862 5.00649968141 162% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 12.0568318317 2.71678728327 444% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 379.143842365 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.3 1.57093596059 146% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 152.270286005 50.4703680194 302% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 235.9 104.977214359 225% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.9669160288 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 30.0 4.12807881773 727% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140314073387 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608764005526 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455408189968 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439598404518 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548294329387 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.4 12.6369458128 248% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -17.18 53.1260098522 -32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.9 10.9458128079 209% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 30.47 11.5310837438 264% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 10.5123152709 295% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.