The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011.
The line chart illustrates how the costs of world food and oil changed over an 11-year period starting from 2000.
Overall, it is immediately clear both of these kinds of prices increased significantly during the given period.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 2000, global food and oil prices started at quite modest figures, with around 90 points and 30$ per barrel respectively. After undergoing some mild fluctuations during the first 7 years, oil price saw a considerable growth to reach its peak in the middle of 2008, at 130$ per barrel. At the same time, the food price index witnessed a similar upward trend to over 220 points. Over the second half of 2008, the numbers of both sectors given declined dramatically to half of their mid-2008’s figures. Surprisingly, food cost experienced a quick recovery to hit its peak at nearly 240 points while the figure for oil price ended at 100$ per barrel in 2011.
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 67
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 61
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$30'.
Suggestion: $30
...dest figures, with around 90 points and 30$ per barrel respectively. After undergoi...
^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$130'.
Suggestion: $130
...each its peak in the middle of 2008, at 130$ per barrel. At the same time, the food ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 676, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
...while the figure for oil price ended at 100$ per barrel in 2011.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88050314465 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68669057353 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8314789767 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22398658587 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100308002005 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627554752506 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133785613131 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621188967201 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.