are signs found on Sinosauropteryx fossils those of feather remnants or not?
While in the reading part the author presents some evidence s, which shows prove that lines found on Sinosauropteryx fossils cannot be the remnants remanence of feathers, the lecturer is strongly confident that they can. did. The points to elaborate on the very contradiction are presented below.
First of all, the author mentions that the fine lines maybe do not represent remains remnance of functional structures, and they can just be parts of animal skin. Meanwhile, the lecturer highlights that these kinds of marks could have can been left only by functional structures. Moreover, she points out that it is a common feature in other fossils found too.
The second piece of evidence that the author emphasizes is the fact that scientists cannot say exactly which part of the body the lines belong to. Most probably, They can be signs of the frills of the animal. The lecturer argues on this idea with mentioning that frills and feathers have a different chemical composition. Whereas, the lines do contain beta-carotene which is a special part of feathers.
The author's last argument posited by the author is the functional uselessness of feathers of this construction. The lecturer contradicts this view point by pointing out that feathers could be used to allure a mate pair, which means they it had a display function. This is likely to be the case because the feathers were colorful, especially orange and white.
To sum up all the arguments of both pieces of the material the passage, it turns out to be obvious that as the author mentions that the fine lines cannot be remainsnannts ce of feathers and even presents evidences to support prove this point of view. In turn, the lecturer highlights some reasonable features which prove that the animal did have feathers depicted in the fossils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-19 | Gayane Tadevosyan | 80 | view |
- four-day work week instead of five-day one 70
- Is life nowadays easier than it was when your grandparents were kids? 70
- Learning a foreign language in the country of its origin or in your country. 66
- Which kind of traveling do you prefer - TRaveling in your country or to another country? 70
- are Sinosauropteryx fossils feather remnants or not has been updated. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'remnants'' or 'remnant's'?
Suggestion: remnants'; remnant's
...n Sinosauropteryx fossils cannot be the remnants remanence of feathers, the lecturer is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Did
...er is strongly confident that they can. did. The points to elaborate on the very co...
^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...ts that these kinds of marks could have can been left only by functional structures...
^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...ts that these kinds of marks could have can been left only by functional structures. Mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fossils found too. The second piece of evidence that the author emphasizes is t...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... have a different chemical composition. Whereas, the lines do contain beta-carotene whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sage, it turns out to be obvious that as the author mentions that the fine lines ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99337748344 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70853640667 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519867549669 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4116187773 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14477765069 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509609756212 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544406922486 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827472825481 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406052711702 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.