Children should be occupied at all times and should never be left to their own devices. Do you agree or this agree with this statement? Use specific reasons to support your answer.
It has debated that children should be occupied and should never be left to their own devices for years. While some people argue that having sphere times has some advantages on children, others claims that it has some notable disadvantages. Though both sides have pros and cons, I am in the opinion that occupying the children’s all times has social, entertainment related and educational benefits that should not be neglected. I will explain the details of my claims in the following paragraphs.
Occupying the children’s all times has some social advantages. If parents or teachers do not let children free, they can easily socialize. Kindergartens where little children spend their time with their peers, are the best way of socializing for children. They learn how to talk with people, how to share their possessions and how to express themselves in kindergarten. Children can have good relationships when they come together other people. Thus, they can learn communication and having relationship, if they are not left alone.
Furthermore, if parents or teachers occupy children’s all times, children do not waste their times, because they will be busy with something in their all times. In these times, parents or teachers can teach several useful information to children. Watching educational cartoons or reading qualified books with children provides an increase at their school success. They also cause not to pay attention to harmful habits for children when they learn useful and qualified information from cartoons or books.
Some people often claim that children should have free times to entertain. They state that making children busy in all their times will make them being bored, but if parents or teachers let them free they can create their own activities, so they will be pleasant at their free times. On the contrary, I totally disagree with these ideas. Children do not know what they can do in their sphere times, so they will probably waste their free times, if we do not interfere. Thus, they will be bored in their free times. However, if we do not let them free, we can direct them to have enjoyable times with playing games.
All in all, the advantages of occupying children’s times outweigh the advantages of letting them free. It gives us a number of social, educational and entertainment related benefits. Children can socialize and learn beneficial information, f their parents or teachers occupy their times. They can also spend their times with more fun with the interfere of their parents or teachers to their own spaces.
- There is an article about the the ecocertification offered by an international organization and it is explained that American people do not interest it, in the listening passage the lecturer claims that Americans should pay attention to it. Summarize the 73
- There is a writing in which it is stated that appearing on television brings benefits to professors, universities and public. On the contarary, in the listening passage the lecturer opposes this idea. Summarize the point mad in the lecture, being sure to 73
- Do you agree work in team or alone. 70
- There is a reading passage in which the writer states that humans and other mammals beheave alturistic. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects this claim with some examples in the listening part. Write an essay to contrast them. 81
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...debated that children should be occupied and should never be left to their own de...
^^
Line 8, column 345, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...so spend their times with more fun with the interfere of their parents or teachers to their o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16428571429 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80573897607 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435714285714 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8353381643 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270160069668 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986585873946 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822035032983 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187614684526 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475210915658 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.