Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
It is argued that all university students should study whatever they like but some individuals claim that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Personally, I think it would be better when university students learn subject which involves in occupation in the future
In the one hand, most of people believe that university students could be free in choosing what subject they like but whether or not it purely good? Students could learn what they like without caring a score. If they learn favorite subject, they will show the talent about field education and contribute heartily about it. According to the report of universities, students ready to learn favorite subject overnight in spite of healthy and background. However, they could be easy to get lost due to wrong direction. Because they do not have densely experience, they do not follow the pathways thus they do not distinguish between wrong and right. For instance, I used to be crazy about math hence I spent all the time learning it but I could not define exactly how should I learn. And finally I gave up learning math since I did not continue it. Furthermore, students could waste numerous time learning subject which not connects with the future work. Nowadays, a considerable number of people do not work according to the industry they study hence they feel useless when they study it.
In the other hand, I strongly believe that people should study subject that will be useful in the future. It is rooted from various reasons. Firstly, students would be used to connecting with field education. They have specialize knowledge and intensive ability hence they can be confident when applying for a job. For instance, you tend to apply for a banking, you should practice numeracy skill in order to avoid confusion. Moreover, students could base on theory that they used to learn in university in order to serve for work. Another example, If you were a farmer, they would know about difference seed from then they can easily deal with several situations.
In conclusion, it seems to me that students university should study subject that helps them in the future work, although others claim that people should be free in studying what they like
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | Siamak.shabankhah | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | dilipkarki | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-25 | tien.xinh.ne | 73 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- People are living in a “throwaway society”, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to? 67
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sport. Why is it? Is it a negative or positive development? 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 67
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to subject'
Suggestion: to subject
...e better when university students learn subject which involves in occupation in the fut...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...upation in the future In the one hand, most of people believe that university students could ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... in choosing what subject they like but whether or not it purely good? Students could learn wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
...ction. Because they do not have densely experience, they do not follow the pathways thus t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'specialized'.
Suggestion: specialized
...necting with field education. They have specialize knowledge and intensive ability hence t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ns. In conclusion, it seems to me that students university should study subject that he...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould be free in studying what they like
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92030848329 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50300075657 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478149100257 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1252208637 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.736842105 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517583516009 0.244688304435 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168172615572 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178900274886 0.0667982634062 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403213604187 0.151304729494 266% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156739267703 0.056905535591 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.