what are the advantages and disadvantages of renewable resources of energy
Nowadays, new renewable resources of energy have emerged to be predominant in the energy industry. Beside certain spectacular upside, numerous drawbacks still coexist.
In the past, humanity had been developing a deep dependence on fossil fuels and these energy resources not only are primarily to blame for environmental degradation but also have an adverse impact on our health. This is now no longer the case due to the exponential growth of renewable energy systems and their crucial benefits. Firstly, renewable energy is an infinite and sustainable source of power, thereby appearing to be a long-term and pragmatic solution to meet the ever-increasing global demands for energy. Secondly, renewable sources of energy serve as an impeccable alternative to non-renewables and play a decisive role in protecting the environment as well as wildlife habitat. Renewable power generated from natural resources produces much less greenhouse gas emissions in comparison with its non-renewable counterpart and therefore helps to retain control of our globe’s average temperature, which also prevents polar ice caps from melting.
That is not to say that renewable energy’s development does not encounter any obstacles. It goes without saying that renewable forms of power, in general, is indeed intermittent since weather conditions are of paramount importance in energy production and thus decides the outcome of the process. Take wind energy as a prime paradigm, wind turbines could not turn their blades without sufficient wind, which is likely to bring about fits and starts on a regular basis. Additionally, it is extremely difficult and extravagant to build and operate renewable energy generators. For instance, generating electricity from solar energy requires 45 times more space than nuclear power and even less efficient than expected.
In conclusion, although new resources of energy possess a variety of valued advantages, there are also several disadvantages which have yet to be eradicated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | TranthikimNgoc | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | Duong Gia Han | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | Duong Gia Han | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | Duong Gia Han | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | tranthihuynhnhu | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63815789474 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10570218797 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.007046348 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.846153846 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332788094083 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121807331992 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727962333099 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204195577364 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247099197426 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.