The number of French adults who parents spoke a regional language of French to them when they were children, and the number who speak a French regional language to their own children
A glance at the bar graphs reveal the total of French adults who parents spoke a regional language of French to them when they were children, and the total who speak a French regional language to their own children. Overall, the number of adults speaking a regional language to their own children is determined by their spoken habitually rather than spoken occasionally at their childhood. Furthermore, Alsatian and Occitan are more popular than other languages in terms of speaking usage.
Alsatian language is spoken to the children by 400 parents by far the highest proportion and the figure for parents speaking such a language in habitually and occasionally in their childhoods were 600 and 200 respectively. The number of adults speaking Occitan as their habits had the same proportion as that Alsatian while the number for ones speaking Breton was 250 adults.
However, 1000 adults spoke Occitan and 400 adults spoke Breton occasionally in their childhood were higher than those Alsatian so that it could affect the proportion of them to spoke to their children which were between 100 and 300 adults. The other categories, Creole and Corsican are rarely spoken to the children, just under 100 people because they did not frequently speak such languages as much as current usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-06 | tabe_success | 79 | view |
- The number of French adults who parents spoke a regional language of French to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional language to their own children 79
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 84
- Social media has completely changed the way family and friends communicate with each other What are the other reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12322274882 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62006878729 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469194312796 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4517624361 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.428571429 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.564271414098 0.215688989381 262% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.25452381224 0.103423049105 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206216670226 0.0843802449381 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380798402683 0.15604864568 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205289321117 0.0819641961636 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.