Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the high popularity on some consumer goods derive from the wide-range advertising spreading, which cannot reflect the real and necessary demand for the goods, that means customers has been misguided by the advertisement. In my opinion, the advertisements might be
able to make them make some irrational purchasing decisions.
There are two main reasons why consumers might make some irrational decision due to the influence on the advertisements. First, some well-designed advertising is capable to attract consumers’ attention. Apparently, advertising is one of the major ways to know and understand the latest technology. Thus, the information, which is going to reveal the unique comparative advantages, must be designed in order to attract people. For example, consumers can buy the cellphone, which is known by them clearly from advertising, if the producers advertise their produce wide-range. Thus, advertising indeed stimulates the improvement of the sales volume.
In addition, some consumers might purchase some goods whose brands are endorsed by some stars who they admire. Because they are willing to buy some products as the souvenirs about the stars although the goods are not necessary for their life. For example, consumers who are Jordan’s hardcore might buy Air Jordan shoes, which even is not suitable for their feet.
In spite of this, such sales volume still ought to reflect the real situation about the demanding on the goods. Because it is the most significant consideration, before making decisions, whether they are able to afford the goods. Thus, advertising is a secondary aspect to influence their decision-making.
In conclusion, adverting indeed attract more consumers to buy some goods, whereas the price and themselves economic status are more important before they say “ I will take it”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | gulbakhyt_90 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | kuldeep sharma | 80 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | ssc5515 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | authinh | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- many governmet 11
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the procedure of weather forecasting in Australia 61
- The tables below 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... my opinion, the advertisements might be able to make them make some irrational p...
^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... for their life. For example, consumers who are Jordan's hardcore might buy Air Jo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, second, so, still, thus, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54225352113 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08733550939 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8876199117 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184321179169 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648800362753 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044349698225 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939243479637 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648695978583 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.