“Your first impressions when you meet someone are always right.”
Do you agree with this statement?
Often first impressions form the basis for judging a person’s personality and background. There are two lines of thoughts when considering the significance of first impressions. I am inclined to agree that first impression is important to some extent; however, my support is in the favour of knowing the person better instead of establishing the judgments just on looks and the way of dressing as I support the more holistic way of getting to know people.
To begin with, I believe that the first impression only gives just a glimpse of somebody’s character. There can be a variety of underlying factors and reasons for why the person is behaving in a particular way. If someone, for example, is in their own world and does not initiate a conversation and does not smile in a party where it is required to mingle, it could be because maybe the person is not well enough or have a serious trouble in the family. Judging by his first impressions, that person can be easily labelled as arrogant and unfriendly. However, if someone made an effort to know the person and the reason behind being a recluse in the party, the former judgment is entirely reversed. In addition, outer appearances change and evolve but the inner personality remains the same. People who form their perception on the basis of outer fleeting appearances are often considered shallow and narrow.
On the contrary, there are instances where first impressions are of foremost importance, such as in job interviews. Recruiters are specifically trained to sort potential employees just on the basis of the first impression and recruiters hope that they are right. The first impression not only includes the way of dressing, but also the way a person speaks and carries himself.
To conclude, although there are instances where the first impression matters and needed to be taken into account, I strongly believe that it is always prudent to get to know a person before jumping to a conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | shivangi patel | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | HARSHITA JAITLY | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Sudabeh | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | adhage | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | ranakandar | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
- Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty five can continue to live full and active lives In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make 89
- Some people choose a career according to the social status and salary it will give them. Others choose a career according to whether they will enjoy the work.Which do you think is the best way to choose a career? 61
- In recent years life has become more stressful than it has ever been As a consequence more and more people are suffering from stress related problems What factors are contributing to this increase and what do you think can be done to overcome the current 78
- In your opinion, why is the circus still a popular form of entertainment in the modern electronic age? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98489425982 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90322737675 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5573589373 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158775360375 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602366995414 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545839789429 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103210720624 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302190752351 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.