Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
To judge a work in any given field or make reviews of the works, one should be well aware about that field. I agree with the assertion that for the critical judgment one should be an expert on that field and then only those critics are given value. Judging a work is not a trivial thing it need a lot of research about the field.
First and foremost, work can be only judged by those who is utopian on that field. A work can’t be judged by the ordinary people, who do not have knowledge on that field. For instance, as in our school, our homework’s or assignment is judged or evaluated by the respective teachers. The teacher who teaches science evaluates our science assignment and evaluating our science assignment by the math’s or any other teacher is superfluous and is of no worth. Therefore, it seems obvious that the expert of the respective field only can judge the respective works.
Secondly, the works or output of some field, is only understood the respective field expert. Moreover, one field might seem arcane to people from other filed. For instance, an engineering field expert can relate the works from biological field and, so he or she is not eligible for the critical judgment of the works for other filed which he or she is unaware about. Thus, one can only comprehend the work or output of the field who are of those field. Layman on the field are just dilettante to perform the critical judgment.
Finally, the critical judgment is for the response of the works, it can be criticize or appreciated during evaluation process. As, the critical judgment might provide good or bad result, it the requisite for every work. The critics may result on appreciation of the works or output produced or they make draw out the fallacies on it. The critic helps to motivate on their works, and helps one to enhance their works, account on revising their works, to make more effective. Thus, the critical judgment is not just for the comment, it’s for the betterment of the owner of the works, those critics produced by the layman in such field is no more than trash which are useless. Therefore, it is conspicuous that one should be the expert of that field to draw the effective critical judgments.
In the nutshell, the critical judgment is itself a critical process it is not an ordinary thing to do, it requires profound knowledge on that field to do so. However, the critics that are implies by the expert are only of significant importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 54
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 58
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 66
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...draw the effective critical judgments. In the nutshell, the critical judgment i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73963133641 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59361966403 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396313364055 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8149346972 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9523809524 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279746526926 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106410557242 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578427741326 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18076205547 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677995428764 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.