The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate electricity production units from fuel source in france and australia between 1980 and 2000. it can be seen from the pie charts that australia relied on coal whereas france relied on nuclear power.
In 1980, coal accounted for 50 percentage of units of electricity by fuel source while hydro power and natural gas produced 20 units each other and the number of units oil production stood at 10. 20 years later, the percentage of electricity production units from coal was 1.5 time higher than the figure in 1980, beside that hydro power produced 36 units. gas and the power of hydro productions were just total of 4 units.
In contrast, france used nuclear power when australia wasn’t. The units number of coal and natural gas were 25 units for each other when nuclear power and oil were not far behind with 15 for the power of nuclear units and 20 for the oil. In 2000, nuclear power became the main fuel source because it produced 126 units whereas coal and oil had 25 electricity units for each one. hydro power and natural gas almost disappear from the pie chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and five yo 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two graphs below show the percentages of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in liters in selected countries for period 1960 2000 95
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ce and australia between 1980 and 2000. it can be seen from the pie charts that au...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Gas
...ide that hydro power produced 36 units. gas and the power of hydro productions were...
^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hydro
... had 25 electricity units for each one. hydro power and natural gas almost disappear ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as almost disappear from the pie chart.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72538860104 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30983502905 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445595854922 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.988046812 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361425306065 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198152190595 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184944480604 0.0843802449381 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311998434217 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144622626515 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.4 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.