Effect of internet and social media on young people communication and forming language
Recently, the phenomenon of effect of internet and social media on young people communication and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that speaking skill can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, young people communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, language formation might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of language internet and social media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-10 | bashirheidari | 80 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | pbdarab | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | ghasemi.na | 88 | view |
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 88
- What is the best invention of the last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics or the airplane? Why? Explain with examples 85
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money. 89
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
- What is the best invention of the last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics or the airplane? Why? Explain with examples 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79591836735 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24522909362 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673469387755 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7799733659 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.090909091 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239129002421 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756504664187 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129133450641 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122704567526 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706044934493 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.