Some people choose friends who are different from themselves. Others choose friends who are similar to themselves. Compare the advantages of having friends who are different from you with the advantages of having friends who are similar to you. Which kind of friend do you prefer for yourself? Why?
Having good friendships are important because your friends are your second family. We all are different in the way we choose the people to make this second family. Some people will choose friends who are similar to them, while others will prefer to choose friends who are different from themselves. Personally, I would rather have friends that are different of myself because it makes the friendship more interesting and more real.
On one side, you can find several advantages to be friends with people who are different from you. You learn to be open minded, that each person is different, and you can still appreciate them for who they are. Moreover, these friendships can make you discover other parts of yourself that you did not know they existed.
On the other side, being friend with people who are similar to you can make you feel more understood. For example, they understand more your passion if they have the same. Furthermore, you can share a lot of activities with these friends because you have the same interest.
In my case, I prefer to be friends with people who are different from me. In fact, since I’m a child I always had friends who were from different backgrounds than me, with different personalities, and I find it very pleasing. Thanks to these friendships, I learn a lot and I am more open minded. Besides, I think that I feel more connected to these people. For instance, if we are staying together is not because of the comfort that we are the same but because we want to spend time together.
In conclusion, both sides have their advantages, it is up to you to find what’s suits you best.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-14 | nicktyranov | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | fairytale | 60 | view |
| 2014-01-19 | hajarisfahan | 75 | view |
- DDT 68
- If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life. Some read; some exercise; others work in their gardens. What do you think are the best ways of reducing stress? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 60
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you think scientists should be given the freedom to test and experiment however they please or should they be limited in what they can study Give reasons and examples to support your opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'had' and 'friends'.
Suggestion: had always friends
...m me. In fact, since I'm a child I always had friends who were from different backgrounds tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 286.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72027972028 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58538003704 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482517482517 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0621391431 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.375 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511980628097 0.236089414692 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179371436213 0.076458572812 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166332953094 0.0737576698707 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280662394283 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113485402681 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 86.8835125448 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.