In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Do you agree or disagree?
Finding and commencing a job, is a crucial juncture of people's lives, inasmuch as one's leading a proper life is not feasible without a job in today's world. A question, which is a matter of debate, a controversial one, is whether recognizing type of career as a secure and appropriate one is easier these days or not. Although it is hard to reach a consenssus on this issue, I am to a great extent on the beleif that nowadays is easier to identify security of job. The resaons of my choice are manifold, among which developed and educated community, and media dominate.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justifies the thesis is that in today's world, whith its galloping progress peaple are more developed and are aware of the importance of career opting and consider it much more meticulasly compared with the past. Facilities of education made it possible for the vast majority of individuls to be educated. It is crystal clear that being educated gives remarkable indicators of job properties and plays a crucial rule in person's success.
Alongside the first reason elaborated above people are more knowledgable thanks to media such as television and internet. To elucidate more, based on statistic issued the group of people who are willing to choose a job, those who had accsses to these media and was more informed have selected suitable job according to their personality, age and traditions socially acceptable in their countries. For example, there are several channels on the television which perform some talks with entrproniers, owners of businesses, empoloyees, to name but a few. They clarify pros and cones of and wax and wane of jobs.
Drawing upon the reasons delineated above, there are always some exception which are excluded from the general rule. I do belive thet job identification is simpler today on the ground that people are educated and media is a good source of information for those who are looking for a job. Let's not take the blessing of technology and education for granted and try to make the most of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | yasaman-pooshidani | 80 | view |
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 73
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 73
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions where there are many people others like the ones with fewer people which one do you prefer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... juncture of peoples lives, inasmuch as ones leading a proper life is not feasible w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...on for those who are looking for a job. Lets not take the blessing of technology and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, for example, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89398280802 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78822622222 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578796561605 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8972083497 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138821911619 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394336541617 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415248784148 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777461569904 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406778147237 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.