: some people think it is more important to plant trees in open areas in towns and cities than to improve more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree
The arrangement of growing trees in inner towns and cities is a major of concern in our modern society. some people argue that national and local authorities should prioritize on planing trees in open areas rather than upgrade housing systems. Personally, I totally agree with this conception to following reasons.
Firsts of all, I advocate the idea that it is paramount important to make a room for trees in open areas in cities. The primary reason is that green tree is a prominent solution to mitigate air pollution. It was proven that emission and fumes from a large number of vehicles commuting in inner cities have posed a threat to human health. Green trees in surrounded areas might tackle this problem by photosynthesis and respiration which reduce carbon dioxide and generate more fresh air. Moreover, having diversity of plant in metropolis brings a resourceful learning environment for children living in metropolis. In other words, children would have chances to approach the ecosystem then raising their awareness of natural environment.
Secondly, it is a fallacy that housing is more significantly important. People argue that housing system need to be upgraded to meet the exorbitant demands of growing population. while there are many people are living in shabby houses, upgrading housing system might enhance the living standard of them. However, people might settle down in high-rise buildings or apartments to take a room for greener surroundings. In fact, government has constructed skyscrapers with reasonable price in attempt of encouraging people choose these type of accommodations over traditional house.
In conclusion, although housing system is in need of upgrading, growing more trees in open areas in cities and town should be primary priority.
- the graph below shows the number of subscribers paying for fixed telephone line and mobile phone network in Africa between 1994 to 2007 73
- the new media have become more influential in people’s life, some people think it is a negative problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 89
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
- some groups such as poor people and people from rural areas find it is difficult to access the university education University should make it easy for the student coming from the rural areas to get an access to the university 74
- people still value artists in the age of advanced science and technology. Why you think this is? Are arts as important as science and technology? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...major of concern in our modern society. some people argue that national and local au...
^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...was proven that emission and fumes from a large number of vehicles commuting in inner cities have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...piration which reduce carbon dioxide and generate more fresh air. Moreover, havin...
^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...orbitant demands of growing population. while there are many people are living in sha...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...accommodations over traditional house. In conclusion, although housing system i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38928571429 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88268714988 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9609963856 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246291837435 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727916613253 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629729191008 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158848032038 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586859534907 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.