Some young people are leaving countryside to live in cities or towns; it leaves only old people in countryside.
What are the causes of this issue? What can be done to solve this problem?
The migration of young adults from rural area to metropolis without their parents has brought about a myriad of problems which adversely affects personal and social life. It has been found that loneliness and gap in family bonding are often caused due to the long distance relationship between old and young people. This distance precipitates stressful and dissatisfied life in a family.
In order to find effective solutions to the problem, we need to examine some of the reasons that are inducing young adults to move from countryside to towns. The most important reason is young employees are moving to cities in order to find an employment or to accelerate their career growth. This is not only because jobs are available in towns but most of the corporate offices of businesses are also located there .Another significant reason is unavailability of better educational institution in villages. Youngsters are, therefore, enrolling themselves in colleges and universities of cities which provide better education. A third reason is vibrant lifestyle of urban areas that is dreamt of by most of the adolescents.
Obviously, migration of young people to cities without aged parents is a serious issue; and, a number of urgent measures need to be taken to solve this. Firstly, Business and offices need to be decentralized across the country so that employment could be found both in urban and rural areas. Regarding standardized education, the most obvious answer is omnipresent establishment of desirable educational institution in rural areas. In addition, the state ought to enact a legislation to appoint skilled teachers in those establishments. Finally, did we construct modern shopping centers and different recreational facilities in villages, young people would not leave countryside. The government, therefore, ought to consider imposing rules and regulations before permitting new establishment in city.
To conclude, there is no blanket solution for this problem. Nonetheless, if measures I have suggested were introduced, adolescents would enjoy a better quality life along with their old family members. Only by bringing modern facilities in rural areas can we halt youth migration to town.
- Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison. Instead they should do unpaid work in the community. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Some young people are leaving countryside to live in cities or towns it leaves only old people in countryside What are the causes of this issue What can be done to solve this problem 89
- In most universities there are more male students than female students on science courses. What is the reason for this? What could be done to balance out the numbers? 84
- Some people think that going to a fitness centre regularly is unnecessary Instead they believe that combining occasional exercise such as going for walks with a balanced diet is enough to stay healthy To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Individual should handle climate change or it is the government’s responsibility. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ions to the problem, we need to examine some of the reasons that are inducing young adults ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ces of businesses are also located there .Another significant reason is unavailabi...
^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...s of businesses are also located there .Another significant reason is unavailability of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.472303207 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05147970004 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586005830904 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0483645372 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.411764706 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230361361721 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609250066542 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558854440542 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119381913863 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296289889957 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.