average yearly the US expenditure on the cell phone, national fixed-line and international fixed- line from 2001 to 2010
The provided line graph the amount of yearly money spending on three different services, namely mobile phone, land-line phone in the US from 2001 to 2010.
It is clearly evident that the US spending on the mobile phone was a sharp rise, the opposite was true for national land-line services. Also, the amount of expenditure on international land-line was the lowest over the period
In 2001, the amount of money spent on national land-line service was around $700, compared to the US expenditure for overseas land-line and mobile phone services was by approximately $200. Over the next five years, there was a decrease to $200 in national land-line services. By contrast, oversea land-line services expenditure saw a sharp rise to roughly $300. At the same time, witnessed a gradual increase to just under $300 in the oversea land-line expenditure.
In the year 2006, the same figure for money spent on the mobile phone and national land-line services, about just over $500 on each. From the year 2006 onwards, it can be seen that American expenditure on the mobile phone surpassed national land-line and oversea land-line services and become the most common means of communication, with approximately $500 in the last year, while national land-line services decreased to about $400 at the end of the period. At the same time, witnessed stability at just above $300 in average yearly American expenditure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-20 | thuylinh2323 | 67 | view |
- source of electricity generated 78
- average yearly the US expenditure on the cell phone, national fixed-line and international fixed- line from 2001 to 2010 67
- visitors 30
- tourist 11
- household car ownershipthe number of car is expected to increase quicklyIt is expected that the number of car will riseexpectation show thatpredictionexpected -- expectation, predicted---prediction 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e year 2006 onwards, it can be seen that American expenditure on the mobile phone...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07391304348 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78886863796 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447826086957 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.0812605491 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32358827412 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169830269699 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895347189768 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252453342844 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606597366849 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.