Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people would argue that individuals cannot deal with environmental issues. Nevertheless, I personally believe that the government can not solve this problem on their own without the actions of individuals.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some citizens suppose that they can not solve environment troubles by themselves. The first reason is that they think these are too big for their ability. Namely, environmental issues such as the increase of global warming or climate change are the enormous problem can solely solve by their government. Noteworthy, the perception that finding the solution for environmental problems is the obligation of the government makes them ignore their tasks for nature surround them. Besides, some citizens can not realize the obvious changes in the environment. Melting ice or increasing the temperature does not make tremendous effects on their daily lives. Although pollution is on the increase, the changes in their lives are almost nothing.
On the other hand, I would argue that the government can not deal with these issues unless the actions of individuals. First of all, people all over the world is responsible for the environment. Human activities are the main factor pushing the environment on dangers. Consequently, they have to face the duty to resolve these results. Last but not least, the government need their cooperation. Particularly, if the perceptions and actions of citizens do not change, Environment Law is useless. Especially, to solve the tremendous problem need to have numerous actions. People must change their mind and do positive actions to show their responsibility.
In conclusion, even though some people think that the huge problems of the environment can not solve by individuals, I personally believe that the government can not deal with these issues without individual actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Hoa Kim | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Shanuching marma | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | deep arsh | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | gies5566 | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-09 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- As well as making money, businessesalso have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt need their cooperation. Particularly, if the perceptions and actions of citize...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38907849829 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96405722672 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501706484642 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.770094644 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7222222222 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331531196936 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098311625613 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751990741193 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227995853272 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419352169601 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.