The chart below shows the porpotion of british students at one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to engilsh,in 2000 and 2010.
The two pie charts illustrate the percentage of british students able to communicate various foregin language at one university of england in year 2000 to 2010.
Over all,In both years considerable proportion of students were able to speak spanish where as the least ratio of these student could speak german.
In early 2000,the amount of student able yo speak spanish was 30% which later on continuously increased by 5% to 35%.consequently became the highest spoken language at both year.similarly,the quantity of student speaking two other language and another language were also in the path of increasing by 5% thus peaked to 15% and 20% respectively up to terminal year.
Meanwhile,the percentage of french and no other language spoken by student were dropped by 5% from 15% to 10% and 20% to 10% respectively in the time interval of one decade.where as the number of student speaking german language remained constant through out the both years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trate the percentage of british students able to communicate various foregin lang...
^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...ngland in year 2000 to 2010. Over all,In both years considerable proportion of s...
^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... of students were able to speak spanish where as the least ratio of these student could ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'these students'?
Suggestion: this student; these students
...eak spanish where as the least ratio of these student could speak german. In early 2000,t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o of these student could speak german. In early 2000,the amount of student able...
^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% to 35%.consequently became the highest spoken language at both year.similarly,t...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... spoken language at both year.similarly,the quantity of student speaking two other ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... thus peaked to 15% and 20% respectively up to terminal year. Meanwhile,the pe...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ively up to terminal year. Meanwhile,the percentage of french and no other langu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t were dropped by 5% from 15% to 10% and 20% to 10% respectively in the time inte...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...vely in the time interval of one decade.where as the number of student speaking german l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...aking german language remained constant through out the both years.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, similarly, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08158911395 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.0280854562 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 201.25 112.824112599 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.75 22.9334400587 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372749857938 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237467059874 0.103423049105 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855454755166 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237467059874 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855454755166 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.4 13.2329268293 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.