ethanol vs gasoline
Both the reading passage and the recording discuss the potential of ethanol as a replacement for gasoline. While the reading claims that ethanol is not a good replacement, the lecturer thinks the opposite.
To begin with, the reading passage states that Ethanol can not reduce global warming compared to gasoline. However, the professor says that it definitely can. He mentions the fact that to produce ethanol, many plants are grown and because they absorb Carbon dioxide, they could help remove this greenhouse gas from the atmosphere.
Second, the writer states that if ethanol is used commonly, there will be less plants for animals to eat. Nevertheless, the professor challenges that point by saying that ethanol can be produced by using cellulose from other plants which are not eaten by animals. Therefore, in his view, the increase in ethanol production is not necessarily related to the decline in animals' food.
Finally, to contradict the claim in the reading that ethanol will be more expensive than gasoline without the tax support from the government, the lecturer contends that it is not likely true. He says that ethanol will be an economical choice in the future, eventhough there will be no tax support. He claims that the more ethanol users, the cheaper the price will be. He even provides a prediction that shows when the number of ethanol users increase three times, the ethanol price will decrease 40%.
That is how the professor believes the points in the reading passage are unconvincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun plants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ethanol is used commonly, there will be less plants for animals to eat. Nevertheless...
^^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l users, the cheaper the price will be. He even provides a prediction that shows w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08835341365 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57202501081 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0546166208 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4615384615 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235090782255 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880028147583 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462490132481 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114112990364 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656085936837 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.