Some people think that watching sport is a waste of leisure time.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, most sports have their enormous fans around the world. Sport lovers try to follow and support their favorite team or athletic. Somebody by going to stadium, and others by watching sport on TV or internet. Some people believe that, watching sport on free time is meaningless and people waste their time, while other think differently. They spend lots of time for watching sport and enjoy it. This essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides and extend my partial support to the latter view before arriving at conclusion.
The first positive point of watching sport is that, individuals can stay at home beside their family while they watch their favorite sport on TV in their free time. It helps them to do their entertainment with their family and the atmosphere of their life will be warmer and more friendly. Moreover, with following sport on TV or any other ways, people can improve their knowledge and skills on that sport and they encourage to doing sport in their next leisure time. For instance, boxing, skiing or wrestling are kinds of sports that people can learn it by watching and can do them as an armature, so looking out on any sport can incite individuals to do any exercises. Furthermore, some persons are disabled or cannot do any sport but they love sport. They can go to sport halls or watch their favorite sport on TV at their spare time.
On the other hand, some people think that, instead of watching sport can do any other things such as reading books or listening to music in leisure time. Additionally, it is obvious that, doing some sports are more acceptable than watching them. It may reduce stress and increase confident and finally people will be healthier.
At the conclusion, in my opinion, people should do anything that they feel better on it in their free time. If they find this meditation by watching sport and it is a good way for relaxing, so they should do it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | malveer | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Harrynguyen1980 | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
- You have received a letter from your bank, asking you to acknowledge receipt of a new bank card. However, the card was missing from the envelope. Write a letter to the bank’s head office.-Explain why you are writing-Express concern about the missing car 56
- Your office building doesn’t have parking available.Write a letter to the manager. In your letter-Explain the problem-Suggest a solution-Say why parking will benefit all employees 73
- Some people think that watching sport is a waste of leisure time.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant. You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager. Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant. In your letter,-Explain why you were at the restaurant-Describe the problems-Write about 73
- Last Tuesday you flew from New York to Paris When you arrived home you discovered that you had left your cabin bag on the plane Write a letter to the airline Where and when you lost your bag What your bag looks like What it is contents were 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75147928994 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3833743669 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48224852071 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8178617819 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373533617874 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152780566459 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100522702752 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267361988418 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671070261877 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.