Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways no speaker or reformer ever could.
Sometimes unknown problems come to us in such a bizarre way that we never think of. Here, the prompt tells us that the best way to elucidate unprecedented, bizarre problems through scandals rather than rhetoric from reformer or, some eminent person. I mostly agree with this claim for two main reasons.
most of the contents in media (especially TV media) are based on entertainment and their main motive is to earn through TRP rating because as more viewers means more rating and which results in more revenue. this is why they try to make the scandal issue more intriguing to the viewers. due to this fact, the viewer get fascinated by the news and thereby, unprecedented problems underlying scandals becomes acquainted by many people across the globe. For instance, scandal regarding Facebook became viral after news broke out which resulted millions of viewer became aware of unknown issue of data smuggling, which was mentioned previously by many speakers. so due to compelling presentation from media, there is high chance of unknown problem to be flashed rather than quotidian rhetoric from any other speaker.
due to the fact that people think most of the speaker are biased, even if they try to reveal any problem to the people, they don't really take them much seriously. For instance, in previous presidental election, there was two-way diatribe between candidates: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. even if, they both accused one other in various issues, people didn't really cared about them. but, when media broke news about Trumph's collusion with prostitute with sufficent evidence, people began to realize, how big of problem their president actually is. so, due to biased nature of human, no matter how the persuasive the rhetoric is, people will still believe that there is hidden motive behind their seemingly connive speech.
however, in some cases, the speaker do tend to focus attention toward problems that haven't been faced yet. Specially looking back at history, we can read about influential ruler or reformer ,who the people undubtedly accolade and think them being veracious, brought some problem up front that no one would have ever guessed. For instance, the speech of Martin Luther King lured, not only black people, but also enticed white one, to join fight against discrimination on racial issue, before which many people thought it as mere agenda. Thus, through influential people ,however, it is possible that it brings important issue aboveboard to analyse and ponder on.
In conclusion, in most of the cases, scandals do focus attention on problems more effectively than any rhetoric does. it is actually quiet complex topic, however, as today's scenario indicate, scandals are proven very effective to raise important issue aboveboard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-06 | Bishal Pokharel | 66 | view |
- 35 The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to on 60
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."A recent national survey found that the majority of workers with access to the Internet at work had used company computers for perso 75
- "Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances, such as refrigerators and air conditioners, that are almost twice as energy efficient 29
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways no speaker or reformer ever could. 66
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...th this claim for two main reasons. most of the contents in media especially TV ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...earn through TRP rating because as more viewers means more rating and which results in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ting and which results in more revenue. this is why they try to make the scandal iss...
^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...l issue more intriguing to the viewers. due to this fact, the viewer get fascinated...
^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... mentioned previously by many speakers. so due to compelling presentation from med...
^^
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...an rhetoric from any other speaker. due to the fact that people think most of t...
^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... reveal any problem to the people, they dont really take them much seriously. For in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...ates: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. even if, they both accused one other in vari...
^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...sed one other in various issues, people didnt really cared about them. but, when medi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
..., people didnt really cared about them. but, when media broke news about Trumphs co...
^^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ind their seemingly connive speech. however, in some cases, the speaker do tend to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...to focus attention toward problems that havent been faced yet. Specially looking back ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...read about influential ruler or reformer ,who the people undubtedly accolade and t...
^^
Line 7, column 570, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...agenda. Thus, through influential people ,however, it is possible that it brings i...
^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ore effectively than any rhetoric does. it is actually quiet complex topic, howeve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, really, regarding, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20758928571 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51591613222 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8169654596 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.789473684 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5789473684 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223488120575 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646058987761 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534955083776 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118674391967 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141636733338 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.