The chart and table below show customer satisfaction level in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999, 2000 and 2007
The bar chart shows information about the data for how fulfillment passengers were in America and the table chart displays the proportion of customers who experienced with the specific part of the airline in the three different years.
It can be seen from the bar chart that there was a slight upward trend in the passengers who enjoyed with their flight. In addition, the table chart saw witnessed about the percentage of airline aspects which increased gradually in most of part.
The lowest proportion of satisfied passengers was nearly two third, which occurred in 1999. However, this figure increased to 69% in 2000 and it reached a peak in the next seven year with the percentage of 72%
The percentage of people who rated the flight attendants and the gate agents were around 87 to 92% in the 8-year period. However, 45% people commented about the flight prices in 1999 and this percentage increased dramatically by nearly 20% in the year of 2007. In addition, the passenger who contributed ideas about the schedule in 2000 and 2007 with 79% was higher than in 1999 with 75% and it also higher than the people who felt comfortable with their seat, which was only 47%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Prem patel | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-09 | SaiNls | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | SaiNls | 73 | view |
| 2017-01-14 | Stephanie Kaushal | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart shows information about th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... airline in the three different years. It can be seen from the bar chart that t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h increased gradually in most of part. The lowest proportion of satisfied passe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xt seven year with the percentage of 72% The percentage of people who rated the f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81280788177 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53796430844 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2475365162 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218893781096 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101337960477 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573531194826 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138879860038 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449317518732 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.