A person should never make an important decision alone." Do u agree / disagree

Essay topics:

A person should never make an important decision alone." Do u agree / disagree

Human life is a long journey and in this long journey we all face such situations, where we need to take important decisions. This decision making process involves deep thinking and utilization of experience to become successful. I agree with the above statement that we should not take crucial decision alone rather we should discuss among our family members and relatives before taking any such decision. In the following essay, I will elaborate why I agree with the above statement.
This is primarily because decision-making is a complicated process, which requires to depth analysis of the problem to find out the root cause and then to find the solution of the problem. Prior experience and insightful thinking are the prerequisite to make an effective decision. We, the human being have limitations and no one person is completely independent. Involving family members and relatives in the decision-making makes our life easier and it helps us to come to right decision. In this process, everyone can share their experiences and tell their view regarding any subject matter so that it assures to reach a fruitful conclusion. My own experience is a compelling example of this. After my college life, I was indecisive whether to choose Engineering or Medical Science at my undergraduate. Then my father discussed it with my family members and I got myself admission at Engineering, which ultimately proved a correct decision later.
Additionally, involvement of family members in the decision making process make our life easier and comfortable. This is so because if a decision ended with a failure, then no single person is blamed for this. In fact, engaging family members while taking important decision gives a feeling that every one is important in the family and it assists to increase the bondage among the members of the family.
To conclude, I believe that we should not take vital decision alone. Rather we should take the crucial decision by discussing with family members and relatives. This is so because it helps to choose a right decision and it results into enhancement of bondage among family members.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-13 hakobyan04.07 3 view
2019-04-17 gkb 61 view
2018-09-03 vibhuti patel 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user gkb :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to engineer'.
Suggestion: To engineer
...ife, I was indecisive whether to choose Engineering or Medical Science at my undergraduate....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ondage among the members of the family. To conclude, I believe that we should no...
^^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...e should not take vital decision alone. Rather we should take the crucial decision by ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cement of bondage among family members.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, while, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12068965517 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90297021938 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497126436782 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6553049399 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.45110844103 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205883950122 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721976674858 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498955199177 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139414492173 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195364011733 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.