People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world ?
It is true that people nowadays critically lack comprehension about nature. A number of factors can be held responsible for this worrying trend, which can be addressed by certain measures.
There are two reasons for the public’s low awareness of the importance of nature. One factor is the general public’s heedlessness towards such a subject. Most people are primarily concerned about issues that seem to bear direct relevance to their welfare or have an immediate impact on their life such as economic development, education or healthcare. Hence, problems such as environmental degradation, accelerating clime change, the preservation of food chain, biodiversity or the coexistence of the ecology are mostly not even close to desires to know of many. The education programs at school should also be to blame. To be more specific, curriculums tend to place too much emphasis on important subjects such as science or language and practical skills. As a result of such unjust prioritization, lessons on the natural world would inevitably be sidelined or completely abstracted, leading to youngsters’ neglect of this issue.
However, this situation could possibly be relieved by the following solutions. Firstly, citizens are highly recommended to be exposed to the visual inputs from the mass media about the natural beauty and its importance, and it sounds realistic to convey this type of information via documentaries, reality shows, TV brief yet lingering facts with attractive illustrations should be made omnipresent in public places such as city squares or bus stops to draw public attention. Secondly, mainstream academic contents should be incorporated with lessons or extracurricular activities to promote awareness about the natural world. Besides, students should be encouraged to participate in competitions about certain environmental problems, or frequent visits to wildlife reserves should be organized.
In conclusion, reasons for people’s lack of understanding about nature can be explained by some reasons, but proper solutions can be taken to help them learn more about the world around them
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-22 | quynhhuongmc | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-29 | Jango Jo | 73 | view |
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 84
- The unlimited use of cars cause many problems. What are those problems ? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people ro use cars ? 84
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 84
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s world? 61
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communications between managers and workers are important other people said that other factors are more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... this issue. However, this situation could possibly be relieved by the following solutions....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended being'.
Suggestion: recommended being
...solutions. Firstly, citizens are highly recommended to be exposed to the visual inputs from the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63157894737 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24835528477 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637770897833 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.5635855437 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238399126127 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781914802295 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918169093938 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173663382441 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108208426347 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.