Discuss on the statement The World Wide Web has destroyed the quality of students assignments Support your claims with appropriate grounds and warrants

Essay topics:

Discuss on the statement: “The World Wide Web has destroyed the quality of students’ assignments.” Support your claims with appropriate grounds and warrants.

Discuss on the statement: “The World Wide Web has destroyed the quality of students’ assignments.” Support your claims with appropriate grounds and warrants.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-17 Nguyen Lan Anh 87 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...rthermore, the information cited in the students assignment could be unevaluated because...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'admit checking'.
Suggestion: admit checking
...rts 2006, rarely do 82% of the students admit to check information but as Ralph Alberico 1995 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1367, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...fficult task themselves by using WWW as a prioritize tool thanks to its effectiveness togeth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...n the benefits the WWW brings. Some may argue that World Wide Web serves as the faste...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, sort of, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 41.998997996 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4398.0 1615.20841683 272% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 775.0 315.596192385 246% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67483870968 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.27625073458 4.20363070211 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36880215925 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 391.0 176.041082164 222% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504516129032 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1369.8 506.74238477 270% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 20.0 2.52805611222 791% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 16.0721442886 230% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7391897363 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.864864865 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9459459459 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27027027027 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343610883531 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917635452895 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908321470887 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215627589302 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091746702235 0.056905535591 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 229.0 78.4519038076 292% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.