The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advance technology which can prevent and solve crime.
It is true that development in technology has caused fall in rates of crime. In my opinion, I agree that advancement in technology has lead to prevention and resolution of crime.
There are various discoveries that have enabled us to avert crimes from happening. Firstly, bomb detection devices are significant to identify the site of explosive materials and bomb defusing techniques are very effective to deter any explosion. These devices have greatly reduced criminal activities. For instance, Iran was the centre of terrorism and there was a surge in terrorist activities, therefore people were reluctant to accept any betterment of the situation. When modern technological instruments were introduced to counter terrorism department, terrorist elements were washed off and there was a large decline in terrorist incidents. Secondly, fingerprint device is a better way to reveal the identity of offenders and before they get in any place with the intent of robbery, security becomes more alert and arrest them. By having effective security measures we have become successful in lowering offenses.
Technological gizmos have solved many problems related to crime. Video surveillance has reinforced security system and with 24-hour monitoring, police can detect criminals. As a result, the issue of soaring crime rates has been resolved. Furthermore, trackers nowadays are used to give information about the location of most wanted criminals. Armed forces have tracked so many people involved in illegal activities and put them behind bars. This has created a sense of fear and they often avoid to do unlawful acts. For example, a leader of famous political party BJP was caught red-handed in the drugs business. He tried to escape from the scene but police traced him and present him before the court. Followers of that leader got discouraged and distanced themselves from the same business in which they were employed before.
In conclusion, I believe advanced technology has helped us in many ways to prevent and solve crimes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid doing'.
Suggestion: avoid doing
... created a sense of fear and they often avoid to do unlawful acts. For example, a leader of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8578564957 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5225048446 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5263157895 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22863879904 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750938149288 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103199152383 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204574662444 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12431248826 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.