Modern technology is now very common in the most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology?
Today’s technological advancements has modernized our working style, shadowed up our entire surroundings. Indeed, it has expanded its feet everywhere and has completed refurbished the way we work. On the contrary, in my view there are this coin does have its second unfolded face, which cannot be neglected.
Granted, technical has revamped our workplaces. It has turned heavy cabinet, which used to be full of files, into a small flash drives. Modern technology has not only transformed our workplace to our handy devices but also it has provided us a unique speed of work. We need not to carry these heavy files anymore and can be easily shared with brink of an eye. Remember the days, when financial year closing used to be nightmare. There are various improved technologies, which has a transformed the accounts closing at year-end into few hours’ activity. With the advent of new technologies, we are able to transform our work place to our handy devices.
On the contrary, alike each achievement has its pros and cons, modern technologies are not left untouched by disadvantageous. Indeed, overwhelming rely on modern technologies does pay back. Machines are machine at the end. Minute technical glitch in so called sophisticated software may turn our mid-night burnt oil into crap. It is worthwhile to understand the technologies does not have its own intelligence so it need to depend on other to validate its accuracy. For example, employee would have not have slept for last night to make a very important presentation, which can be spoiled in fraction of second by a technical glitch in the systems while delivering the presentation.
To conclude, needless to emphasis the contribution of modern technologies in completely revamping our workplace and our work style, we need to remember that it suffers much more limitations than human beings do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-21 | gsw.singh@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | jchalana85 | 67 | view |
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree?Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactiv 84
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- All societies have their own music and art In what way are music and art important for society and for the individual 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'drive'?
Suggestion: drive
...to be full of files, into a small flash drives. Modern technology has not only transfo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'carry'?
Suggestion: carry
... us a unique speed of work. We need not to carry these heavy files anymore and can be ea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...y. For example, employee would have not have slept for last night to make a very imp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, second, so, while, for example, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20132013201 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0785693663 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6133504583 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7058823529 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158244673096 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522585715339 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051827705755 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111209610338 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370329696293 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.